PROs in practice: more than just a questionnaire

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are well documented, well studied instruments that clinicians can start to implement today, according to Professor David Wohl from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. In this second of a three-part series, Professor David Wohl discusses the importance of incorporating PROs into daily practice and future clinical trials.

According to Wohl, the clinical focus with modern antiretroviral regimens goes beyond getting viral loads suppressed and concerns about safety and is now about understanding the experience of people living with HIV (PLHIV) who are on life-long medications.

“The future is going to definitely incorporate PROs as part of the work we’re doing,” said Wohl. “Until there is a cure, people will be taking these medications for decades. So, if there’s a bothersome symptom, even if it’s mild, and we can avoid that, it’s incumbent upon us to try to do that. We need to understand what it’s like to be on these medications,” he added.

Professor Wohl emphasised that PROs are not simply a series of random questions directed at waiting room patients. Good clinical research demands that any measurement tool must first be clinically validated; preferably within the specific cohort for whom it is intended. Validation is essential, not only for guiding the types of questions that PLHIV should be asked in relation to specific issues, but also for making better sense of what insights such questions might convey.

There are now number of well-validated generic and disease-specific tools available to capture PROs. “These are well studied instruments that many of us can implement right now,” said Wohl.

View the interviews with Professor David Wohl

How PROs might become part of clinical care?


PROs – validated reliable and ready for use today.


Related articles

PROs in practice: Starting the conversation

Find out more

What’s it really like to be living with HIV on treatment 

Find out more